Isle of Misfit Ploys: The Cuban Embargo

Matthew Moret

Abstract


The U.S.’s stance towards Cuba has historically used rhetoric about the lack of civil liberties, dictatorship, and security to defend the embargo put in place during the 1960s. Politicians of the era viewed communism in Cuba as an immediate threat that had to be snuffed out before it could infect the entire hemisphere. Their hope was that by isolating the island, Cuba’s citizens would be compelled to fight for reform and institute their own democracy. That approach, however, has backfired entirely. Neither government is innocent — Cuba’s human rights record remains as poor as ever and the U.S. has almost singlehandedly destroyed the country’s economy and health system. Though guilt is shared, the U.S. alone controls the relationship’s future. Reforms are in their infancy, but in light of the turbulent past, there has been progress. 


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ppr.2015.55

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments




Copyright (c) 2017 Matthew Moret

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program.


ISSN 2160-5807 (online)