Pitt Political Review https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr PPR has ceased publication with the ULS. Editions including and prior to the fall 2017 edition will remain archived with the ULS. For information concerning future issues including the submission of potential articles for new issues, please email <a href="mailto:pittpoliticalreview@gmail.com">pittpoliticalreview@gmail.com</a>. en-US <br /><strong>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: </strong><br /><br /><ol><ol><li>The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.<br /><br /></li><li>Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.<br /><br /></li><li>The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/" target="_blank">Creative Commons 3.0 License (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works)</a>, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:<ol style="list-style-type: lower-alpha;"><li>Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;</li><li>Noncommercial—other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;</li><li>No Derivative Works—other users (including Publisher) may not alter, transform, or build upon this Work,with the understanding that any of the above conditions can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license. <br /><br /></li></ol></li><li>The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.<br /><br /></li><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication <em>manuscript</em> (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_blank">The Effect of Open Access</a>). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.<br /><br /></li><li>Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.<br /><br /></li><li>The Author represents and warrants that:<br /><br /><ol style="list-style-type: lower-alpha; padding-left: 40px;"><li>the Work is the Author’s original work;</li><li>the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;</li><li>the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;</li><li>the Work has not previously been published;</li><li>the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and</li><li>the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.</li></ol></li></ol></ol><br /><ol><li>The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.</li></ol> pittpoliticalreview@mail.pitt.edu (Kelly Posenau) e-journals@mail.pitt.edu (OJS Technical Support) Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Table of Contents https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/97 Letter from the Editor-in-Chief and Table of Contents Jacob Pavlecic Copyright (c) 2017 Jacob Pavlecic https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/97 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 The Third World War: A Look at the Implications of Climate Change on Global, National Security https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/86 President Donald Trump ran to be president of the United States on a platform rife with statements denouncing the credibility of anthropogenic — man-made — climate change. In a separate, but equally important, vein, President Trump also expressed a commitment to ensure the security of US citizens both domestically and abroad. Today, however, it’s difficult to address national security effectively without simultaneously addressing global climate change. The two issues are intimately interwoven, and ignoring one issue will compromise the success of solving the other. Lauren Schlusser Copyright (c) 2017 Lauren Schlusser https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/86 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Reclaiming the Center: The Case for a Ceasefire in America's Culture War https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/89 <p>Partisan news sources of all political stripes would have us believe that there’s a war raging on in American society. Increasingly prevalent is the notion that America is in the grips of what some despairing analysts (and gleeful news anchors) have labeled a “Culture War”- the ultimate expression of our increasingly polarized political life, in which the two competing viewpoints stay in their own yards, only seeking out media sources that validate their existing ideals, and lobbing attacks across the fence at the enemy camp.</p> Majorie Smith Copyright (c) 2017 Majorie Smith https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/89 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 US Healthcare: A "Disaster" of a System https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/90 <p>The United States has seen presidential administrations with lofty goals for healthcare policy come and go time and again since its founding, but never an efficient healthcare system. The healthcare debate has been raging in America for years. Should healthcare be universal? Should it be publicly or privately funded, or both? Should all citizens have the right to healthcare? Should all citizens be required by law to have healthcare? The case for universal healthcare seems to be the strongest because it is the most cost-effective way for society to fulfill its humanitarian obligations.</p> Daphne Myers Copyright (c) 2017 Daphne Myers https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/90 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Drinks on Us: Defending the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/91 <p>According to to Yuengling: the History of America’s Oldest Brewery, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB) was designed to, in the words of then-Governor Gifford Pinchot, make liquor sales “as inconvenient and expensive as possible.” The PLCB is the state agency with sole control over the distribution and sale of alcohol in Pennsylvania. State House Republicans agree with Gov. Pinchot and have been arguing that it is time to privatize the PLCB. They charge that the agency is “archaic” and losing money. Supporters of the PLCB argue that privatization would result in higher prices for consumers and the loss of well-paying Pennsylvania jobs. While the PLCB does have some inherent features making it harder to buy alcohol, the best option for the citizens of Pennsylvania is a modernized PLCB.</p> Jacob Pavlecic Copyright (c) 2017 Jacob Pavlecic https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/91 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 How Much Democracy is too Much Democracy? https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/92 Despite their widespread use, many rightfully question the prudence of using popular elections to fill state courts. A key difference between federal and state courts is that while federal judges are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, the majority of jurists at the state level are elected. The reason federal judges, at least judges on the Article III courts, are made by executive selection is the same reason that Supreme Court justices are given life tenure: to insulate them from the whims of public opinion. In this passage, Hamilton articulates the fundamental paradox of democracy, a question that genuine republics have always grappled with: how can we control for the “tyranny of the majority?” In other words, how can we entrust people with the power to govern themselves but also prevent them from stripping away the rights of minority groups or from posing a danger to others? Mary Kathleen Dryer Copyright (c) 2017 Mary Dryer https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/92 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Shahs and Sanctions: The Story of Past, Present, and Future Tensions with Iran https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/93 <p>It’s hard to deny that the historically intense distrust between the United States and Iran helps motivate some of the anti-deal sentiment in each country. It’s also, however, this same shared history of suspicion that may hold some of the most import-ant insights about the deal itself. The context for this understanding is the thread of Iranian-Western relations through the ages of colonialism and decolonization, the Islamic Revolution, and the formation of the current regime in Iran. A further layer of complexity in looking at the nuclear negotiations is added with the consideration of the contemporary social and political atmosphere in the Iranian domestic sphere. This often-overlooked background speaks of a situation far more complex than what many who oppose the accords seem to entertain and that must be taken into account if the United States and the West want to see long-term diplomatic success with Iran.</p> Henry Glitz Copyright (c) 2017 Henry Glitz https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/93 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Under the Skin: Russia’s Budding Healthcare Crisis https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/94 <p>Behind the ghost of the Iron Curtain lurks a public health crisis. Superseded in the media by East-West tension and military flare-ups, infectious disease has launched its own war on the Russian Federation. Besides the HIV epidemic, which has continued to escalate for decades, the Russian Federation has become a greenhouse for multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). This problem is not just a problem of the Russian Federation, but has worldwide significance due to the spread of resistant TB. Furthermore, the issue has not received the attention it deserves from the international media or the Russian government. MDR-TB in Russia needs to be taken more seriously.</p> Madeline Kehl Copyright (c) 2017 Madeline Kehl https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/94 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Renewable Energy: Non-environmental Reasons to Make the Transition https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/95 <p>Environmentalists continuously push for us, as a country, to decrease our fossil fuel usage and transition to a society powered by renewable energy. The money of oil companies and other corporations persuade our government to continue investing in fossil fuels as opposed to renewable energy. There are, however, other reasons which should convince us as a nation to invest in alternative energy sources. Eliminating our dependence on fossil fuels will benefit the nation economically and prepare us for a rapidly changing future. We, as Americans, should increasingly pursue renewable sources of alternative energy not only for the documented environmental reasons but also because investing in renewable energy technologies will provide jobs for Americans, decrease our dependence on other nations, and benefit the health of all Americans while decreasing our dependence on fossil fuels.</p> Andrew Johnson Copyright (c) 2017 Andrew Johnson https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/95 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Guilty Until Proven Innocent: The Abuse of Pretrial Detention in America https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/96 <p>Although few principles of law are as widely lauded and universally accepted as the presumption of innocence, this principle is violated daily by a practice that has become standard in our justice system, exceptional only in how unexceptional it seems. Pretrial detention—the practice of holding a defendant in custody before trial while he or she is still entitled to the presumption of innocence—is, in its current status, a clear contradiction of this principle and a staple of the American legal system.</p> Mary Dryer Copyright (c) 2017 Mary Dryer https://ppr.pitt.edu/ojs/ppr/article/view/96 Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000