Reader Comments

Solve Integration Online For Free

by sachin khanna (2017-11-09)

In response to Preço das pilulas de emagrecimento

We should bring the subordinate as for x of x to the n in addition to 1-th control over n in addition to 1 or more some steady c. What's more, we will accept here, in light of the fact that we need this articulation to be characterized, we will expect that n does not equivalent negative 1. On the off chance that it met negative 1,

we'd be isolating by 0, and we haven't characterized what that implies. So how about we take the subsidiary here. So this will be equivalent to- - well, the subsidiary of x to the n in addition to 1 over n in addition to 1, we can simply utilize the power run here. So our example is n in addition to 1. We can bring it out front. So it will be n in addition to 1 times x to the- - I need to utilize that same shading. Hues are the critical step - times x to the- - rather than n in addition to 1,

we subtract 1 from the example. This is quite recently the power run the show. So n in addition to 1 less 1 will be n. And after that we can't overlook that we were partitioning by this n in addition to 1. So we have partitioned by n in addition to 1. And after that we have in addition to c. The subsidiary of a steady as for x- - a consistent does not change as x changes, so it is quite recently going to be 0, so in addition to 0. What's more, since n isn't equivalent to negative

1, we realize this will be characterized. This is recently going to be something partitioned without anyone else's input, which is quite recently going to be 1. What's more, the subject of rearranges to x to the n.

So the subordinate of this thing- - and this is an exceptionally broad terms- - is equivalent to x to the n. So given that, what is the antiderivative- - given me a chance to switch hues here. What is the antiderivative of x to the n? Furthermore, recall, this is quite recently the sort of unusual looking documentation we utilize. It'll bode well when we begin doing distinct integral calculator. In any case, what is the antiderivative of x to the n? What's more, we could state the antiderivative concerning x, in the event that we need to. What's more, another method for calling this is the inconclusive basic.

All things considered, we know this is stating x to the n is the subordinate of what? All things considered, we simply made sense of it. It's the subsidiary of this thing, and we've composed it in exceptionally broad terms. We're really epitomizing numerous constants here. We could have x to the n in addition to 1 over n in addition to 1 in addition to 0, in addition to 1, in addition to 2,

or more pi, in addition to a billion. So this will be equivalent to x to the n in addition to 1 over n in addition to 1 or more c. So this is quite effective. You would kind be able to of view this as the switch control run the show. Furthermore, it applies for any n, as long as n does not equivalent negative 1. Give me a chance to make that reasonable. n does not equivalent negative 1. By and by, this thing would be unclear if n were equivalent to negative 1. So we should do two or three illustrations just to apply this- - you could call it the turn around control manage on the off chance that you need, or the counter power run the show.

So we should take the antiderivative of x to the fifth power. What is the antiderivative of x to the fifth? All things considered, we should simply say, well, look, the 5 is equivalent to the n. We simply need to increase the example by 1. So this will be equivalent to x to the 5 in addition to 1 control. And afterward we isolate by that same esteem. Whatever the example was the point at which you increase it by 1, we isolate by that same esteem, partitioned by 5 in addition to 1.

Also, obviously, we need to epitomize the majority of the conceivable antiderivatives, so you put the c directly over yonder. So this will be equivalent to x to the 6th more than 6 or more c. Also, you can confirm. Take the subordinate of this utilizing the power administer, you in fact get x to the fifth. We should attempt another. How about we attempt - now we'll do it in blue. How about we attempt the antiderivative of- - how about we make it fascinating.

We should make it 5 times x to the negative 2 control dx. So how might we assess this? Indeed, one disentanglement you can do- - and I haven't thoroughly demonstrated it to you at this time - however we realize that scalars can go all through the subsidiary administrator when you're increasing by a scalar. So this is, in reality, equivalent to 5 times the antiderivative of x to the negative 2 control, dx. What's more, now we can simply utilize,

I figure we could call it this hostile to control administer, so this will be equivalent to 5 times x to the negative 2 control in addition to 1 over the negative 2 control in addition to 1 or more some steady directly here. And after that we can rework this as 5 times negative 2 control in addition to 1 is x to the negative 1 over negative 2 in addition to 1 is negative 1, or more some consistent. Furthermore, this is equivalent to 5 times negative x to the negative 1 or more some steady. And after that in the event that we need, we can circulate the 5. So this is equivalent to negative 5x to the negative 1. Presently, we could compose in addition to 5 times some consistent, yet this is only a subjective steady. So this is still only a self-assertive steady. So perhaps we could [INAUDIBLE] this. On the off chance that you need it to demonstrate that it's an alternate steady, you could state this is c1, c1, c1. You duplicate 5 times c1, you get another consistent. We could simply call that c, which is equivalent to 5 times c1. However, there you have it. Negative 5x to the negative 1 or more c. What's more, indeed, these, attempt to assess the subsidiary, and you will see that you get this business, directly over yonder.